Skip to main content
DFG Research Training Group 2686: Contradiction Studies –
Constellations, Heuristics, and Concepts of the Contradictory
Logo of the University Bremen
Logo of Worlds of Contradiction
University Bremen
Worlds of Contradiction
DFG Research Training Group 2686: Contradiction Studies –
Constellations, Heuristics, and Concepts of the Contradictory
Home > Members > Spokespeople of the RTG
Switch language to German
  • home
  • research training group
    • about the rtg
    • research program
    • qualification program
    • care, equality and diversity board
  • conference 2025
  • news
  • events
  • publications
  • members
    • faculty
    • post-docs & docs
    • management team
    • assistants
    • mercator fellows
    • guests
  • application
    • info
    • faq
  • contact

Social Media

Twitter/X
Mastodon
Instagram
Funded by
Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft
Part of
World of Contradiction – University Bremen
  • privacy policy

Spokespeople of the RTG

Spokespeople of the RTG

  • Prof. Dr. Karen Struve, 1. Sprecherin des GRK 2686Foto (c) WFB Bremen/Jan Rathke
    Prof. Dr. Karen Struve
    Spokesperson of the RTG
    French and Francophone Studies
  • Portrait photo Prof. Dr. Ingo H. Warnke
    Prof. Dr. Ingo H. Warnke
    Spokesperson of the RTG
    German and Interdisciplinary Linguistics
interstice

“The contradiction of law in Derrida lies in the interstice that separates the impossibility of deconstructing justice from the possibility of deconstructing law.”

Andreas Fischer-Lescano
coherence in thought

“The imperative of non-contradiction generally produces a coherence in thought that is often at odds with social complexities.”

Yan Suarsana
power and resistance

“Michel Foucault says: “Where there is power, there is resistance, and […] this resistance is never in a position of exteriority in relation to power” (History of Sexuality I, The Will to Knowledge, 1976, p. 95)”

Gisela Febel
every day

“Living in contradictions is what we experience every day. Why do we know so little about it?”

Gisela Febel
Afterlife of colonialism

“Contradiction comes in many different forms. None is so debilitating than when the coloniser transitions, textually not politically, to decoloniality without taking the responsibility for the afterlife of colonialism, which they continue to benefit from. Self-examination and self-interrogation of the relations of coloniality, a necessity, seem nearly impossible for the coloniser who continues to act as beneficiary, masked in the new-found language of White fragility, devoid of an ethical responsibility of the very system of White domination they claim to be against.” (Black Consciousness and the Politics of the Flesh)

Rozena Maart